Comprehensive REST API design review with automated linting, breaking-change detection, and design scorecards. Catches inconsistent conventions, missing versioning, and design smells before APIs ship. Use when reviewing a PR that adds or changes API endpoints, auditing an existing API for v2 migration, or establishing API standards for a team.
Tier: POWERFUL
Category: Engineering / Architecture
Maintainer: Claude Skills Team
The API Design Reviewer skill provides comprehensive analysis and review of API designs, focusing on REST conventions, best practices, and industry standards. This skill helps engineering teams build consistent, maintainable, and well-designed APIs through automated linting, breaking change detection, and design scorecards.
# 1. Lint an OpenAPI/Swagger spec for convention violations
python3 scripts/api_linter.py openapi.json --format json -o lint.json
# 2. Detect breaking changes between two spec versions (gate: exits non-zero with --exit-on-breaking)
python3 scripts/breaking_change_detector.py openapi-v1.json openapi-v2.json --format json --exit-on-breaking -o breaking.json
# 3. Score overall design quality (gate: --min-grade fails below threshold)
python3 scripts/api_scorecard.py openapi.json --format json --min-grade B -o scorecard.json
Review flow: run all three, report linter findings + breaking changes + grade to the user, fix, then re-run until the linter is clean, --exit-on-breaking passes (or breaking changes are version-bumped), and the scorecard meets the agreed --min-grade. Never sign off an API review on prose alone — attach the tool outputs.
✅ Good Examples:
- /api/v1/users
- /api/v1/user-profiles
- /api/v1/orders/123/line-items
❌ Bad Examples:
- /api/v1/getUsers
- /api/v1/user_profiles
- /api/v1/orders/123/lineItems
Collection Resources: /api/v1/users
Individual Resources: /api/v1/users/123
Nested Resources: /api/v1/users/123/orders
Actions: /api/v1/users/123/activate (POST)
Filtering: /api/v1/users?status=active&role=admin
/api/v1/users
/api/v2/users
Pros: Clear, explicit, easy to route
Cons: URL proliferation, caching complexity
GET /api/users
Accept: application/vnd.api+json;version=1
Pros: Clean URLs, content negotiation
Cons: Less visible, harder to test manually
GET /api/users
Accept: application/vnd.myapi.v1+json
Pros: RESTful, supports multiple representations
Cons: Complex, harder to implement
/api/users?version=1
Pros: Simple to implement
Cons: Not RESTful, can be ignored
{
"data": [...],
"pagination": {
"offset": 20,
"limit": 10,
"total": 150,
"hasMore": true
}
}
{
"data": [...],
"pagination": {
"nextCursor": "eyJpZCI6MTIzfQ==",
"hasMore": true
}
}
{
"data": [...],
"pagination": {
"page": 3,
"pageSize": 10,
"totalPages": 15,
"totalItems": 150
}
}
{
"error": {
"code": "VALIDATION_ERROR",
"message": "The request contains invalid parameters",
"details": [
{
"field": "email",
"code": "INVALID_FORMAT",
"message": "Email address is not valid"
}
],
"requestId": "req-123456",
"timestamp": "2026-02-16T13:00:00Z"
}
}
Authorization: Bearer <token>
X-API-Key: <api-key>
Authorization: Api-Key <api-key>
Authorization: Bearer <oauth-access-token>
{
"user": {
"id": "123",
"roles": ["admin", "editor"],
"permissions": ["read:users", "write:orders"]
}
}
X-RateLimit-Limit: 1000
X-RateLimit-Remaining: 999
X-RateLimit-Reset: 1640995200
{
"error": {
"code": "RATE_LIMIT_EXCEEDED",
"message": "Too many requests",
"retryAfter": 3600
}
}
{
"id": "123",
"name": "John Doe",
"email": "john@example.com",
"_links": {
"self": { "href": "/api/v1/users/123" },
"orders": { "href": "/api/v1/users/123/orders" },
"profile": { "href": "/api/v1/users/123/profile" },
"deactivate": {
"href": "/api/v1/users/123/deactivate",
"method": "POST"
}
}
}
POST /api/v1/payments
Idempotency-Key: 123e4567-e89b-12d3-a456-426614174000
Cache-Control: public, max-age=3600
ETag: "123456789"
Last-Modified: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 07:28:00 GMT
?fields=id,name,email)Analyzes API specifications for compliance with REST conventions and best practices.
Features:
Compares API specification versions to identify breaking changes.
Features:
Provides comprehensive scoring of API design quality.
Features:
- name: "api-linting"
run: python scripts/api_linter.py openapi.json
- name: "breaking-change-detection"
run: python scripts/breaking_change_detector.py openapi-v1.json openapi-v2.json
- name: "api-scorecard"
run: python scripts/api_scorecard.py openapi.json
#!/bin/bash
python engineering/skills/api-design-reviewer/scripts/api_linter.py api/openapi.json
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
echo "API linting failed. Please fix the issues before committing."
exit 1
fi
Regular use of the linting, breaking change detection, and scoring tools ensures continuous improvement and helps maintain API quality throughout the development lifecycle.
Copy a source-pinned command for your client. You run it yourself.
Destination: .claude/skills/api-design-reviewer · pinned to the source commit
# Run from your project root
git clone https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills.git .skillboard-tmp
git -C .skillboard-tmp checkout 19392f7a08264ed00486a251f5b2098321771f94
mkdir -p ".claude/skills"
cp -r ".skillboard-tmp/.gemini/skills/api-design-reviewer" ".claude/skills/"
rm -rf .skillboard-tmpReview the source before running. This copies files into your project; it is not a one-click install and does not verify runtime safety.
sudo apt update && sudo apt install -y gitnpm install -g @anthropic-ai/claude-code# Run from your project root
git clone https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills.git .skillboard-tmp
git -C .skillboard-tmp checkout 19392f7a08264ed00486a251f5b2098321771f94
mkdir -p ".claude/skills"
cp -r ".skillboard-tmp/.gemini/skills/api-design-reviewer" ".claude/skills/"
rm -rf .skillboard-tmpDestination: .claude/skills/api-design-reviewer
Scanner static-checks@0.1.0 · commit 19392f7a0826. Static checks cannot prove runtime safety – review the source and the exact diff before installing. How checks work.
References credentials, tokens or secret files that a skill should not need.
Evidence: [redacted]· fingerprint 429996dbbc3ace19